Advanced Ceramics Progress

Advanced Ceramics Progress

Optimization of Synthesis Conditions and Characterization of a Ru-Promoted CuO/ZnO/Al₂O₃ Catalyst with Dual Applications

Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Ceramics, Materials and Energy Research Center (MERC), P.O. Box 14155/4777, Karaj, Iran.
2 PhD graduate, Department of Semiconductors, Materials and Energy Research Center (MERC), P.O. Box 14155/4777, Karaj, Iran.
Abstract
Methanol is one of the most important industrial chemicals and is currently in high global demand. Industrial methanol production primarily relies on the hydrogenation of CO and CO₂, a process that simultaneously reduces carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide emissions while producing a valuable chemical product. In addition, the water-gas shift (WGS) reaction plays a crucial role in hydrogen production. Copper-based methanol synthesis catalysts are among the most advanced and widely used catalysts in the petrochemical industry. In industrial plants, synthesis gas is converted into methanol using these strategic catalysts. In the present study, copper, zinc, and aluminum nitrate salts were employed to investigate the feasibility of synthesizing a catalyst composed of copper oxide (CuO), zinc oxide (ZnO), and aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃). Furthermore, due to the requirement for effective adsorption and desorption of carbon monoxide, the effect of incorporating ruthenium into the catalyst formulation was also examined. The synthesized catalysts were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), simultaneous thermal analysis (STA), and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area measurements. The results indicate that the synthesis method used in this study is suitable for preparing this type of catalyst and that the resulting catalysts exhibit good thermal stability under operating conditions, particularly at temperatures around 260 °C.
Keywords
Subjects

1.      Aresta, M., Dibenedetto, A., & Angelini, A. (2013). The changing paradigm in CO2 utilization. Journal of CO2 Utilization3, 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2013.08.001
 
2.      Atsonios, K., Panopoulos, K. D., & Kakaras, E. (2016). Investigation of technical and economic aspects for methanol production through CO2 hydrogenation. International Journal of hydrogen energy41(4), 2202-2214.
 
3.      Baltes, C., Vukojević, S., & Schüth, F. (2008). Correlations between synthesis, precursor, and catalyst structure and activity of a large set of CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts for methanol synthesis. Journal of catalysis258(2), 334-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2008.07.004
 
4.      Beck, A., Newton, M. A., van de Water, L. G., & van Bokhoven, J. A. (2024). The enigma of methanol synthesis by Cu/ZnO/Al2O3-based catalysts. Chemical Reviews124(8), 4543-4678. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00148
 
5.      Behrens, M., Brennecke, D., Girgsdies, F., Kißner, S., Trunschke, A., Nasrudin, N., ... & Schlögl, R. (2011). Understanding the complexity of a catalyst synthesis: Co-precipitation of mixed Cu, Zn, Al hydroxycarbonate precursors for Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts investigated by titration experiments. Applied Catalysis A: General392(1-2), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2010.10.031
 
6.      Bozzano, G., & Manenti, F. (2016). Efficient methanol synthesis: Perspectives, technologies and optimization strategies. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science56, 71-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2016.06.001
 
7.      Chinchen, G. C., Denny, P. J., Jennings, J. R., Spencer, M. S., & Waugh, K. C. (1988). Synthesis of methanol: part 1. Catalysts and kinetics. Applied catalysis36, 1-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-9834(00)80103-7
 
8.      Dalena, F., Senatore, A., Marino, A., Gordano, A., Basile, M., & Basile, A. (2018). Methanol production and applications: an overview. Methanol, 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63903-5.00001-7
 
9.      Dang, S., Yang, H., Gao, P., Wang, H., Li, X., Wei, W., & Sun, Y. (2019). A review of research progress on heterogeneous catalysts for methanol synthesis from carbon dioxide hydrogenation. Catalysis Today330, 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.04.021
 
10.    de Queiroz, G. A., de Menezes Barbosa, C. M. B., A. Pimentel, C., & de Abreu, C. A. M. (2018). Performance of the water gas shift process with a ruthenium catalyst for hydrogen production in a membrane reactor. Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis123(2), 679-687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-017-1313-9
 
11.    Kiener, C., Kurtz, M., Wilmer, H., Hoffmann, C., Schmidt, H. W., Grunwaldt, J. D., ... & Schüth, F. (2003). High-throughput screening under demanding conditions: Cu/ZnO catalysts in high pressure methanol synthesis as an example. Journal of Catalysis216(1-2), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9517(02)00134-3
 
12.    Kipnis, M., Volnina, E., Belostotsky, I., Galkin, R., Zhilyaeva, N., Levin, I., ... & Ezhov, A. (2022). Effective Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 Catalyst for Methanol Production: Synthesis, Activation, Catalytic Performance, and Regeneration. Catalysis Research2(3), 1-20. doi:10.21926/cr.2203027
 
13.    Lormand, C. (1925). Industrial Production of Synthetic Methanol. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry17(4), 430-432. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50184a034
 
14.    Saeidi, S., Amin, N. A. S., & Rahimpour, M. R. (2014). Hydrogenation of CO2 to value-added products—A review and potential future developments. Journal of CO2 utilization5, 66-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2013.12.005
 
15.    Safari, M., Haghtalab, A., & Roghabadi, F. A. (2023). Promoting jet fuel production by utilizing a Ru-doped Co-based catalyst of Ru-Co@ C (Zd)@ Void@ CeO 2 in Fischer Tropsch synthesis. RSC advances13(50), 35525-35536. DOI: 10.1039/D3RA06624J
 
16.    Saw, S. K., Datta, S., Chavan, P. D., Gupta, P. K., Kumari, S., Sahu, G., & Chauhan, V. (2023). Significance and influence of various promoters on Cubased catalyst for synthesizing methanol from syngas: a critical review. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology98(5), 1083-1102. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.7331
 
17.    Smith RJ, B. S., Loganathan, M., & Shantha, M. S. (2010). A review of the water gas shift reaction kinetics. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering8(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-6580.2238
 
18.    Struis, R. P. W. J., Stucki, S., & Wiedorn, M. (1996). A membrane reactor for methanol synthesis. Journal of membrane science113(1), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(95)00222-7
 
19.    Vafaee Zonouz, H., Barzegari, F., & Rezaei, M. (2024). Development of CuO/ZnO/Al 2 O 3-hydrotalcite based catalysts for middle temperature water gas shift reaction: Impact of calcination temperature and residual carbonates. Fuel, 378, 132882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132882
 
20.    Wang, G., Mao, D., Guo, X., & Yu, J. (2019). Methanol synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation over CuO-ZnO-ZrO2-MxOy catalysts (M= Cr, Mo and W). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(8), 4197-4207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.131
 
21. Zhong, J., Yang, X., Wu, Z., Liang, B., Huang, Y., & Zhang, T. (2020). State of the art and perspectives in heterogeneous catalysis of CO 2 hydrogenation to methanol. Chemical Society Reviews49(5), 1385-1413. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CS00614A
Volume 12, Issue 1
Winter 2026
Pages 9-15

  • Receive Date 09 February 2026
  • Revise Date 28 June 2026
  • Accept Date 30 June 2026