Advanced Ceramics Progress

Advanced Ceramics Progress

Magnetic Properties of Molybdenum- and Titanium-based MAX Phases: An Ab Initio Study

Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz 7134851154, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz 7134851154, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Ceramic, Materials and Energy Research Center, Karaj, Iran.
4 Professor, Nanotechnology Research Center, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI), Tehran, Iran.
5 Professor, Department of Ceramic, Materials and Energy Research Center, Karaj, Iran.
Abstract
Most calculations of MAX-phase electronic and mechanical properties begin with an unstated assumption: the material carries no magnetic moment, so spin polarization can be switched off from the first step. Usually, that assumption holds. It is not universal. A handful of MAX phases, once manganese or chromium enters the metal sublattice, develop a real, measurable magnetic moment, and once one family member is confirmed magnetic, the non-magnetic ground state of every other member stops being a safe default. This paper tests that assumption for six molybdenum- and titanium-based MAX phases studied together for the first time: Mo₂AlC, Mo₃AlC₂, Mo₄AlC₃, Ti₂AlC, Ti₃AlC₂, and Ti₄AlC₃. Three of these, Mo₃AlC₂, Mo₄AlC₃, and Ti₄AlC₃, have not previously been examined for magnetism. Using all-electron density functional theory, we compare spin-polarized and non-spin-polarized total energies, converged magnetic moments, and spin-resolved densities of states for every compound, and supplement these diagnostics with a quantitative Stoner-product estimate for every metal site. All lines of evidence agree, and none comes close to the ferromagnetic instability threshold. A parallel comparison against chromium, the M-site element closest to that threshold among early transition metals, throws the behavior of the six compounds into sharp relief. We then trace the answer to how the molybdenum 4d and titanium 3d bands differ from the manganese 3d band that supports magnetism in this family. This is a short paper with a simple message: verifying non-magnetism costs little compared with a full property calculation, and every other property computed for these compounds depends on this check.
Keywords
Subjects

1.      Ali, M. S., Rayhan, M. A., Ali, M. A., Parvin, R., & Islam, A. K. M. A. (2016). New MAX phase compound Mo2TiAlC2: First-principles study. Journal of Scientific Research, 8, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v8i2.25057
 
2.      Anasori, B., Dahlqvist, M., Halim, J., Moon, E. J., Lu, J., Hosler, B. C., Caspi, E. N., May, S. J., Hultman, L., Eklund, P., Rosén, J., & Barsoum, M. W. (2015). Experimental and theoretical characterization of ordered MAX phases Mo2TiAlC2 and Mo2Ti2AlC3. Journal of Applied Physics, 118, 094304. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4929640
 
3.      Barsoum, M. W. (2000). The Mn+1AXn phases: A new class of solids: Thermodynamically stable nanolaminates. Progress in Solid State Chemistry, 28, 201–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6786(00)00006-6
 
4.      Barsoum, M. W. (2013). MAX phases: Properties of machinable ternary carbides and nitrides. Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527654581
 
5.      Barsoum, M. W., & Radovic, M. (2011). Elastic and mechanical properties of the MAX phases. Annual Review of Materials Research, 41, 195–227. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100448
 
6.      Blaha, P., Schwarz, K., Tran, F., Laskowski, R., Madsen, G. K. H., & Marks, L. D. (2020). WIEN2k: An APW+lo program for calculating the properties of solids. Journal of Chemical Physics, 152, 074101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5143061
 
7.      Cover, M. F., Warschkow, O., Bilek, M. M. M., & McKenzie, D. R. (2009). A comprehensive survey of M2AX phase elastic properties. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 21, 305403. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/21/30/305403
 
8.      Dahlqvist, M., & Rosén, J. (2020). Impact of strain, pressure, and electron correlation on magnetism and crystal structure of Mn2GaC from first-principles. Scientific Reports, 10, 11396. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68377-5
 
9.      Dahlqvist, M., Alling, B., & Rosén, J. (2010). Stability trends of MAX phases from first principles. Physical Review B, 81, 220102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.220102
 
10.    Dahlqvist, M., Alling, B., & Rosén, J. (2015). A critical evaluation of GGA+U modeling for atomic, electronic and magnetic structure of Cr2AlC, Cr2GaC and Cr2GeC. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 27, 095601. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/27/9/095601
 
11.    Ingason, A. S., Dahlqvist, M., & Rosén, J. (2016). Magnetic MAX phases from theory and experiments: A review. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 28, 433003. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/28/43/433003
 
12.    Ingason, A. S., Mockute, A., Dahlqvist, M., Magnus, F., Olafsson, S., Arnalds, U. B., Alling, B., Abrikosov, I. A., Hjörvarsson, B., Persson, P. O. Å., & Rosén, J. (2013). Magnetic self-organized atomic laminate from first principles and thin film synthesis. Physical Review Letters, 110, 195502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.195502
 
13.    Ingason, A. S., Petruhins, A., Dahlqvist, M., Magnus, F., Mockute, A., Alling, B., Hultman, L., Abrikosov, I. A., Rosén, J., & Persson, P. O. A. (2014). A nanolaminated magnetic phase: Mn2GaC. Materials Research Letters, 2, 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2013.865105
 
14.    Janak, J. F. (1977). Uniform susceptibilities of metallic elements. Physical Review B, 16, 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.16.255
 
15.    Jaouen, M., Bugnet, M., Jaouen, N., Ohresser, P., Mauchamp, V., Cabioc'h, T., & Rogalev, A. (2014). Experimental evidence of Cr magnetic moments at low temperature in Cr2A (A = Al, Ge)C. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 26, 176002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/26/17/176002
 
16.    Lashgari, E., Kalantarian, M. M., Yousefi-Mashhour, H., Sirati-Gohari, M., Ahmadkhan Kordbacheh, A., Eshraghi, M. J., & Omidvar, H. (2026). Ab-initio evaluation of V2O5 as the electrode of intercalation batteries. Materials Today Communications, 54, 115513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2026.115513
 
17.    Kalantarian, M. M., Asgari, S., & Mustarelli, P. (2013). Theoretical investigation of Li2MnSiO4 as a cathode material for Li-ion batteries: A DFT study. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 1, 2847–2855. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2TA01363K
 
18.    Khazaei, M., Arai, M., Sasaki, T., Estili, M., & Sakka, Y. (2014). Trends in electronic structures and structural properties of MAX phases: A first-principles study on M2AlC (M = Sc, Ti, Cr, Zr, Nb, Mo, Hf, or Ta), M2AlN, and hypothetical M2AlB phases. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 26, 505503. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/26/50/505503
 
19.    Meshkian, R., Ingason, A. S., Dahlqvist, M., Petruhins, A., Arnalds, U. B., Magnus, F., Alling, B., & Rosén, J. (2015). A magnetic atomic laminate from thin film synthesis: (Mo0.5Mn0.5)2GaC. APL Materials, 3, 076102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4926611
 
20.    Monkhorst, H. J., & Pack, J. D. (1976). Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Physical Review B, 13, 5188–5192. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188
 
21.    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996). Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical Review Letters, 77, 3865–3868. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
 
22.    Shahpouri, E., Hassani, S., Yousefi-Mashhour, H., Kalantarian, M. M., Ebadzadeh, T., & Mobasherpour, I. (2024). Evaluation of Ti3C2 as electrode material for Li, Na, Mg, Al, K, Ca, and Zn-ion intercalation batteries: A DFT study. Results in Chemistry, 7, 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2024.101385
 
23.    Shahpouri, E., Kalantarian, M. M., Ebadzadeh, T., & Mobasherpour, I. (2025). Investigation on titanium-based MXenes in Li-ion batteries: Empowering future electrodes. Applied Surface Science, 689, 162524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.162524
 
24.    Shahpouri, E., Kalantarian, M. M., Ebadzadeh, T., & Mobasherpour, I. (2026). MXene M2C (M = Ti, V, Cr, and Nb) as electrode material for various intercalation batteries (Li, Na, Mg, Al, K, Ca, and Zn-ion): Ab-initio studies. Surfaces and Interfaces, 80, 108174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2025.108174
 
25.    Sirati-Gohari, M., Javadpour, S., Kalantarian, M. M., Rashidi, A., & Ebadzadeh, T. (in press-a). Rigid-band doping engineering of the thermoelectric power factor in molybdenum and titanium-based MAX-phases.
 
26.    Sirati-Gohari, M., Javadpour, S., Kalantarian, M. M., Rashidi, A., & Ebadzadeh, T. (in press-b). Doping-tunable transport anisotropy and direction-dependent Seebeck in Mo- and Ti-based MAX-phases.
 
27.    Stoner, E. C. (1938). Collective electron ferromagnetism. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 165, 372–414. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1938.0066
 
28.    Sun, Z. M. (2011). Progress in research and development on MAX phases: A family of layered ternary compounds. International Materials Reviews, 56, 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743280410Y.0000000001
 
29.    Togo, A., & Tanaka, I. (2015). First principles phonon calculations in materials science. Scripta Materialia, 108, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.021
 
30.    Yousefi-Mashhour, H., Hassani, S., Momeni, M., Kalantarian, M. M., & Namiranian, A. (2024). Insight into behaviors and properties of AMO2 (A = Na and Li; M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3) cathode materials: A DFT evaluation. Results in Chemistry, 7, 101348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2024.101348
 
31.    Yousefi-Mashhour, H., Kalantarian, M. M., & Namiranian, A. (2023). Effect of fluorine doping on LiCoO2 cathode material: A DFT study. Advanced Ceramics Progress, 9(4), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.30501/acp.2023.425848.1139
 
32.    Zamani, K., Tavoosi, M., Ghasemi, A., & Gordani, G. (2023). Structural and phase stability in the 2TiC-Al-Ti system during milling and subsequent annealing. Advanced Ceramics Progress, 9(4), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.30501/acp.2024.431563.1142
Volume 12, Issue 2
Spring 2026
Pages 24-35

  • Receive Date 10 August 2026
  • Revise Date 23 August 2026
  • Accept Date 31 August 2026