Document Type : Review Article
Authors
1
Associate Professor, Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Malayer University, P.O. Box 65719-95863, Malayer, Iran.
2
Associate Professor, Department of Nanotechnology and Nanomaterials, Faculty of Interdisciplinary Science and Technology, Malayer University, P.O. Box 65719-95863, Malayer, Iran.
3
MSc, Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Malayer University, P.O. Box 65719-95863, Malayer, Iran.
4
MSc, Department of Nanotechnology and Nanomaterials, Faculty of Interdisciplinary Science and Technology, Malayer University, P.O. Box 65719-95863, Malayer, Iran.
10.30501/acp.2026.603569.1210
Abstract
Hybrid supercapacitor electrodes that combine redox-active ceramic or ceramic-related phases with conductive carbon are commonly evaluated based on material properties, such as theoretical charge-storage capability, surface area, and conductivity, alongside measured electrode properties, such as capacitance and rate capability. However, these descriptors do not directly determine practical electrode performance. This review argues that a material-to-electrode translation pathway separates intrinsic charge-storage capability from the measured electrode response. This pathway encompasses hybrid integration, electrode architecture and interfaces, and coupled electron and ion transport. Electrolyte accessibility, reaction distribution, and active-material utilization link these features to practical electrode capacitance, while degradation can alter these conditions during cycling. Carbon is therefore considered part of a functional electrode framework rather than merely a conductive additive. It can provide electronic pathways, influence pore connectivity and electrolyte access, support interfacial contact, and affect the spatial distribution of the ceramic phase. This review synthesizes these coupled effects across ceramic–carbon hybrid electrodes and distinguishes material-level potential from electrode-level utilization and practical performance. Particular attention is given to the effects of electrode thickness, active-material loading, tortuosity, interfacial quality, and reaction heterogeneity. A translation-aware design framework is proposed to connect intrinsic material selection with specified loading, condition-dependent utilization, cycling stability, and independently validated device performance. This perspective shifts electrode development from the isolated optimization of material descriptors toward testable comparisons of the factors that enable or limit active-material participation.
Keywords
Subjects