Advanced Ceramics Progress

Advanced Ceramics Progress

The Effect of Electrospinning Parameters on the Final Structure of the Electrospun PCL Fibers

Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors
Sepehr Afsharian 1
Seyede Fateme Mousavi Nasab 2
Neda Sami 2
Sahar Mollazadeh Beidokhti 3
Abbas Yousefi 4
1 BSc degree, Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.
2 MSc student, Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.
4 Professor, Research Institute Paretavous, Mashhad, Iran.
10.30501/acp.2024.448334.1150
Abstract
In the last decade, regenerating damaged tissues has been a primary focus in tissue engineering research. An ideal wound dressing can be produced from synthetic polymers, such as polycaprolactone (PCL), via electrospinning. The processing variables significantly affect fiber morphology and characteristics, including fiber size and porosity. These factors directly influence the properties of wound dressings. This study investigated how the electrospinning process variables—specifically needle-to-plate distance, flow rate, and applied voltage—affect the diameter and morphology of nanofibers. By adjusting these parameters, researchers can optimize the performance of this technique and enhance the properties of the resulting fibers. Initially, PCL solutions with varying compositions and concentrations were prepared. The results indicated that increasing the voltage from 12 kV to 16 kV across three samples resulted in a decrease in the nanofiber diameter from 205.28 ± 50 nm to 175.74 ± 41 nm. Conversely, changing the flow rate from 0.4 to 0.6 ml/h in two samples increased the average fiber diameter from 210.66 ± 43 nm to 223.18 ± 44 nm. Additionally, increasing the needle-to-plate distance also led to a reduction in fiber diameter. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images revealed that interconnected, thin, bead-free nanofibers could be achieved at high voltages, low flow rates, and longer distances. However, at voltages above 18 kV and distances greater than 18 cm, bead formation in the nanofiber structure became inevitable. Furthermore, the polymer solution containing a certain amount of salt exhibited high conductivity, which resulted in fiber breakage.
Keywords
Poly-Caprolactone (PCL)
Electro Spinning
Wound Dressing
Tissue Engineering

Subjects

  1. Abdollahi, E., & Bakhsheshi-Rad, H. (2018). Evaluation of mechanical properties and apatite formation of synthesized fluorapatite-hardystonite nanocomposite scaffolds. Advanced Ceramics Progress,4(Issue 3-4), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.30501/acp.2018.92930
  2. Abrisham, M., Noroozi, M., Panahi-Sarmad, M., Arjmand, M., Goodarzi, V., Shakeri, Y., Golbaten-Mofrad, H., Dehghan, P., Sahzabi, A. S., Sadri, M., & Uzun, L. (2020). The role of polycaprolactone-triol (PCL-T) in biomedical applications: A state-of-the-art review. European Polymer Journal, 131, 109701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109701
  3. Azimi, B., Nourpanah, P., Rabiee, M., & Arbab, S. (2014b). Poly (-caprolactone) fiber: an overview. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 9(3), 155892501400900. https://doi.org/10.1177/155892501400900309
  4. Baji, A., Mai, Y., Wong, S., Abtahi, M., & Chen, P. (2010). Electrospinning of polymer nanofibers: Effects on oriented morphology, structures and tensile properties. Composites Science and Technology, 70(5), 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.010
  5. Beachley, V., & Wen, X. (2008). Effect of electrospinning parameters on the nanofiber diameter and length. Materials Science and Engineering C, 29(3), 663–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2008.10.037
  6. Can-Herrera, L., Oliva, A., Dzul-Cervantes, M., Pacheco-Salazar, O., & Cervantes-Uc, J. (2021). Morphological and mechanical properties of electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds: effect of applied voltage. Polymers, 13(4), 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13040662
  7. Chinnappan, B. A., Krishnaswamy, M., Xu, H., & Hoque, M. E. (2022). Electrospinning of Biomedical Nanofibers/Nanomembranes: Effects of process parameters. Polymers, 14(18), 3719. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14183719
  8. Dias, J., Baptista-Silva, S., De Oliveira, C., Sousa, A., Oliveira, A., Bártolo, P., & Granja, P. (2017). In situ crosslinked electrospun gelatin nanofibers for skin regeneration. European Polymer Journal, 95, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.08.015
  9. Dias, J., Baptista-Silva, S., Sousa, A., Oliveira, A., Bártolo, P., & Granja, P. (2018). Biomechanical performance of hybrid electrospun structures for skin regeneration. Materials Science and Engineering C, 93, 816–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.08.050
  10. Dickinson, L. E., & Gerecht, S. (2016). Engineered biopolymeric scaffolds for chronic wound healing. Frontiers in Physiology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00341
  11. Dong, Y., Zheng, Y., Zhang, K., Yao, Y., Wang, L., Li, X., Yu, J., & Ding, B. (2020). Electrospun Nanofibrous materials for wound healing. Advanced Fiber Materials, 2(4), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42765-020-00034-y
  12. Doustgani, A. (2015). Effect of electrospinning process parameters of polycaprolactone and nanohydroxyapatite nanocomposite nanofibers. Textile Research Journal, 85(14), 1445–1454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517514566109
  13. Dwivedi, R., Kumar, S., Pandey, R., Mahajan, A., Nandana, D., Katti, D. S., & Mehrotra, D. (2019). Polycaprolactone as biomaterial for bone scaffolds: Review of literature. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research, 10(1), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.10.003
  14. Elkhouly, H., Mamdouh, W., & El-Korashy, D. I. (2021). Electrospun nano-fibrous bilayer scaffold prepared from polycaprolactone/gelatin and bioactive glass for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine, 32(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-021-06588-6
  15. Ferreira, C. a. M., Januário, A. P., Félix, R., Alves, N., Lemos, M. F. L., & Dias, J. R. (2021). Multifunctional Gelatin/Chitosan Electrospun Wound Dressing Dopped with Undaria pinnatifida Phlorotannin-Enriched Extract for Skin Regeneration. Pharmaceutics, 13(12), 2152. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13122152
  16. Ghaffarian, Z., FaqihImani, A., Doostmohammadi, A., & Saeri, M. (2015). Fabrication, Characterization and Process Parameters Optimization of Electrospun 58S Bioactive Glass Submicron Fibers. Advanced Ceramics Progress, 1(3), 16-21. https://doi.org/0.30501/acp.2015.70007
  17. Gil-Castell, O., Badia, J., Ontoria-Oviedo, I., Castellano, D., Sepúlveda, P., & Ribes-Greus, A. (2019). Polycaprolactone/gelatin-based scaffolds with tailored performance: in vitro and in vivo validation. Materials Science and Engineering C, 107, 110296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110296
  18. Ginestra, P., Ceretti, E., & Fiorentino, A. (2016). Electrospinning of poly-caprolactone for scaffold manufacturing: experimental investigation on the process parameters influence. Procedia CIRP, 49, 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.07.020
  19. Ifegwu, O. C., & Anyakora, C. (2018). The place of electrospinning in separation science and biomedical engineering. In InTech eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.77221
  20. Jarusuwannapoom, T., Hongrojjanawiwat, W., Jitjaicham, S., Wannatong, L., Nithitanakul, M., Pattamaprom, C., Koombhongse, P., Rangkupan, R., & Supaphol, P. (2004). Effect of solvents on electro-spinnability of polystyrene solutions and morphological appearance of resulting electrospun polystyrene fibers. European Polymer Journal, 41(3), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.10.010
  21. Joseph, B., Augustine, R., Kalarikkal, N., Thomas, S., Seantier, B., & Grohens, Y. (2019). Recent advances in electrospun polycaprolactone based scaffolds for wound healing and skin bioengineering applications. Materials Today Communications, 19, 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.02.009
  22. Jun, I., Han, H., Edwards, J., & Jeon, H. (2018). Electrospun Fibrous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: Viewpoints on architecture and Fabrication. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(3), 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19030745
  23. Linh, N. V. V., Du, N., My, N. T. N., Tuyen, N. N., Phu, H. D., & Tram, N. X. T. (2022). Electrospun Polycaprolactone/Hydroxyapatite (PCL/HAp) microfibers as potential biomaterials for tissue engineering. Materials Today Proceedings, 66, 2895–2899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.553
  24. Liu, X., Holzwarth, J. M., & X, P., MA. (2012). Functionalized synthetic biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Macromolecular Bioscience, 12(7), 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201100466
  25. Liverani, L., & Boccaccini, A. (2016). Versatile production of Poly(Epsilon-Caprolactone) fibers by electrospinning using benign solvents. Nanomaterials, 6(4), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano6040075
  26. Liverani, L., & Boccaccini, A. (2016b). Versatile production of Poly(Epsilon-Caprolactone) fibers by electrospinning using benign solvents. Nanomaterials, 6(4), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano6040075
  27. Loh, Q. L., & Choong, C. (2013). Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size.‏ https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437
  28. Moniri Javadhesari, S., Koohi, M., & Jabraili, M. (2022). Nanomaterials: Applications in Regeneration of Damaged Tissues. Advanced Ceramics Progress, 8(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.30501/acp.2022.356039.1100
  29. Samadian, H., Maleki, H., Allahyari, Z., & Jaymand, M. (2020). Natural polymers-based light-induced hydrogels: Promising biomaterials for biomedical applications. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 420, 213432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213432
  30. Siddiqui, N., Kishori, B., Rao, S., Anjum, M., Hemanth, V., Das, S., & Jabbari, E. (2021b). Electropsun Polycaprolactone Fibres in Bone Tissue Engineering: a review. Molecular Biotechnology, 63(5), 363–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-021-00311-0
  31. Singh, Y. P., Dasgupta, S., Nayar, S., & Bhaskar, R. (2020). Optimization of electrospinning process & parameters for producing defect-free chitosan/polyethylene oxide nanofibers for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition, 31(6), 781–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2020.1718824
  32. Stratton, S., Shelke, N. B., Hoshino, K., Rudraiah, S., & Kumbar, S. G. (2016). Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering. Bioactive Materials, 1(2), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2016.11.001
  33. Vig, K., Chaudhari, A., Tripathi, S., Dixit, S., Sahu, R., Pillai, S., Dennis, V., & Singh, S. (2017). Advances in skin regeneration using tissue engineering. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18(4), 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18040789
  34. Vyas, K. S., & Vasconez, H. C. (2014). Wound healing: biologics, skin substitutes, biomembranes and scaffolds. Healthcare, 2(3), 356–400. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare2030356
  35. Wang, T., Zhu, X., Xue, X., & Wu, D. (2011). Hydrogel sheets of chitosan, honey and gelatin as burn wound dressings. Carbohydrate Polymers, 88(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.069
  36. Yang, G., Li, X., He, Y., Ma, J., Ni, G., & Zhou, S. (2017). From nano to micro to macro: Electrospun hierarchically structured polymeric fibers for biomedical applications. Progress in Polymer Science, 81, 80–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.12.003
  37. Zargham, S., Bazgir, S., Tavakoli, A., Rashidi, A. S., & Damerchely, R. (2012). The effect of flow rate on morphology and deposition area of electrospun nylon 6 nanofiber. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 7(4), 155892501200700. https://doi.org/10.1177/155892501200700414

  • Receive Date 15 April 2024
  • Revise Date 06 May 2024
  • Accept Date 07 September 2024